Mystery 1: Features & Specs
Microsoft did unveil two near-final versions of Microsoft Surface, one, an ARM based version running the Windows RT & the other, an Intel based version running the Windows 8 Pro. Microsoft talked about the design of the external hardware in greater detail. VaporMg casing, the built-in kickstand, Gorilla glass display, the peripheral venting technology and others. They also spoke in detail about a revolutionary 3mm thin magnetically attachable keyboard case, called Touch/Type Covers. But what about the internals? For the Windows 8 Pro version, we do know for the fact that it runs a optimized version of Intel’s third generation Ivy Bridge chipset. But what about the RAM? What about the battery life? What about the GPU? None of these were disclosed. It’s even worse for the Windows RT version of Surface. We don’t know for sure, as to which ARM processor is being used inside. Some reports suggest that Surface is powered by NVIDIA’s tegra 3+ chipset. But no official wordings yet.
Mystery 2: Price & Availability
I don’t remember of any recent Apple product launch where we don’t get to know the price and availability of the product being launched. I agree it is tough to make the product available the very next day or week. But announcing a product 3 months in advance and not giving the exact time or price makes it look suspicious. Some technologists like Harry McCracken of Time wonder if the whole project is just another vaporware from Microsoft. After all, Microsoft has had a dirty past when it comes to announcing extremely rough drafts of products it didn’t intend to ship any time soon. McCracken’s post lists a few of them in greater detail.
Mystery 3: Business Model
This is the biggest mystery of all. Why Microsoft thought of taking a plunge into PC hardware pool and directly compete with its own OEMs? As a matter of fact, Microsoft kept all the OEMs in dark about the launch of Surface. Does this mean, Microsoft was scared about PC makers ruining its efforts? Isn’t Microsoft risking its good old relationships with the OEMs? Business Week said that Microsoft intends to shame the PC industry which has been lethargic for years when it comes to real innovation. This reasoning gels well with Manan Kakkar’s reasoning that Surface is just a reference model, and that is why it will be sold in Microsoft’s online stores alone. But others like Joshua Topolsky feel Microsoft is mimicking Apple’s business model. Interestingly, one of the major partners of Microsoft, Acer, expects the software major to withdraw the Surface tablet later, but some of his colleagues aren’t really hiding their displeasure about Microsoft selling self-branded tablets. The mystery remains. Is Surface, just a reference model or does Microsoft intend to make it a revenue stream? Wait for the mystery to unravel in the coming months. Update: Some of you wanted to know my own take on this mystery. I am tending to believe the ‘reference model’ theory more than Microsoft taking Apple’s route. Few reasons: one, Microsoft saying that they will not sell the Surface tablets in retail stores, but only on their own online stores is a big indication that Microsoft might not be intending to be aggressive with Surface. Two, Recent reports of Surface being WiFi only (it does have USB port for 3G dongles) indicate Microsoft’s reluctance to negotiate with operators for data plans & subsidies, which in-turn would mean an opportunity for OEMs whenever they come out with their own Windows 8 tablets. In a nutshell, I believe feel Microsoft is keeping all options open. They themselves have not decided on which course they want to take.
